Lonesome Dove
by
Larry McMurtrey
This book, and the TV mini series made from it, have
enjoyed enormous popularity in recent years, to the point that one
begins to suspect some qualities underlying the narrative that are
particularly timely with respect to the state of the culture.
The story is set at about the turn of the last century and
follows a cattle drive from a relatively settled Texas to virgin
territory in northern Montana. The major characters are Augustus
McCrae, an ex Texas Ranger of about fifty or so years of age and his
long time associate, also an ex Texas Ranger, Captain Woodrow Call:
the leaders of the expedition, a prostitute who accompanies them on
the drive: Laurie, Gus's ex romantic interest of some years in the
past: Claire, and a large group of Indians, cowhands, and assorted
white, black, and Hispanic settlers of various flavors.
The part of the culture of interest to the author and being
portrayed here is decidedly lower class, with modest or no
educational achievements of any significance apparent except in rare
cases, perhaps one college graduate in the entire assemblage. Gus
has some pretensions to learning, but he is mostly a natural
philosopher with some admiration for learning. He does read the
Bible, and admires Latin phrases, even though he is unable to
interpret them. Likes them for the form.
The herd is acquired by stealing it from a Mexican rancher.
This doubtful method, amongst a very moral, given their class, group
of men, is justified by recalling that the Mexican, Flores, acquired
them in the same way, by stealing them from Texas ranchers, and
anyway the procedure was of long standing tradition (they meet
Flores going south with rustled horses on their way north with his
herd).
A secondary character, Jake Spoon, soon appears, on the
run from an Arkansan sheriff for accidentally shooting a dentist in
Fort Smith. He is also a former ranger, but of a generally lesser
moral character than Gus and Call.
On the way north, the most famous renegade outlaw Indian
steals Laurie, causing Gus to pursue and recapture her and allowing
him to encounter the pursuing sheriff, July Johnson. July has
married a prostitute, who has deserted him in a pregnant state, and
this has caused him to give up his pursuit of Jake and instead to
pursue her, which leads him to Ogallala, the home of Claire.
The arrival of the herd and the main players in Ogallala
provides the opportunity to explore the main issue in this book,
which I would call the varieties of sexual roles people adopt and the
problems that result. A significant feature of the story, in this regard
is the fact that Captain Call, who never pursues relationships with
women, none the less had a relationship with a prostitute some years
in the past, the result of which was an unacknowledged son who is
one of the drovers. This is a point of some consequence to the
philosopher Gus, who is at pains to develop relationships with
women in his life and considers them of greater importance than any
other feature of his life.
After the abduction of Laurie by the renegade, Blue Duck,
Gus takes it upon himself to nurse her back to health and develops a
love relationship, more on her part than his, in the process.
Claire, Gus's old flame, has in the intervening years
married a duty bound and uncommunicative man capable of
domination by her, but he is in a coma on the arrival of the herd, as a
result of a horse kick, which resulted from his inability to relate
effectively to horses, even though they were his business. When
Claire and Gus meet, it is apparent that they still regard each other
with the special intensity of love, but while Gus obviously hopes for
some chance of revival of their courting days, she recognizes the
impossibility of it and instead concentrates on communicating her
intense hatred for Call, who she considers to be reprehensible for his
failure to acknowledge his son. The author leads us to believe that
she will eventually marry July Johnson, who is disappointed to find
his wife only to discover she has no interest in him. She is
eventually killed by Indians in a pointless attempt to evade July,
even though her hope in life has just been hung for child murder.
In fact, the book as a whole, portrays a culture in which
life is profoundly cheap, and, as Blue Duck observes, likely to get
cheaper. Prostitutes are creeping about everywhere and vary from
the predominant coarse to the relatively refined Laurie, with many
intermediate examples, such as Big Heifer. There are horse thieves
of a particularly insensitive nature, inclined to indulge in the grossest
sort of exploitation of the harmless, a gruesome white slaver who
sexually exploits a child, public carnality, to the extent that one
begins to doubt the reality of it. The relations between the Indians
and whites is particularly lacking in any sort of civility and no noble
Indian is included, though many ignoble ones are. Drunkenness is
endemic.
So, a long story is presented with many interesting
characters, but the essence of the thing, and that which, I would say
gives it its main appeal is the short play that takes place in Ogallala.
This episode begins by describing the arrival of July's wife, who has
her baby there and leaves the child with Claire, who adopts it to
replace her own lost sons, all of whom died in childhood. Then July
happens along and is hired by Claire. Then Gus and Call arrive, a
picnic ensues, and Gus and Claire discuss the state of their romance
over the bed of her comatose husband. They conclude that it has no
potential to both of their great disappointment. Claire communicates
her hatred for Call to anybody that will listen, and the herd moves on
to Montana.
But, this is not the end. Gus, on a scouting expedition in
Montana is ambushed by Indians and eventually dies as a result of
gangrene which arises from arrow wounds in his leg. Before dying,
however, he extracts the promise from Call that his body be
transported to a favored location in Texas, that his half of the herd
be given to Laurie, and that Call deliver two notes from Gus to Laurie
and Claire.
This produces an opportunity for Claire to express the
depths of her feelings for Call, which are bottomless disgust, even
though Call is performing the requirements of loyalty to his friend.
In fact Claire does everything she can to convince Call to give up the
trip and bury Gus in Ogallala.
So, how to understand this drama? Let me begin by
restating my contention that the story is about relationships,
particularly the most important ones, those expressing human
sexuality. Also, remember from elsewhere, that one of the supreme
values of masculinity is adherence to rules of behavior, while a
supreme value of femininity is the development and nurturance of
relationships. The most profound relationships include the sexual
function and therefore occur, in the main, between the sexes.
However, physical males can have feminine psyches and
the reverse, and in fact this defines a spectrum that can and does
include all imaginable mixtures. In this story, I would characterize
Gus as having a psyche somewhat dominated by his femininity. This
accounts for his preoccupation with relationships and generally soft
quality, outside of his violence towards recalcitrant males. It also
accounts for his humorous contempt for Call's commitment to work
and avoidance of pleasure. Call, on the other hand, is totally
masculine to the point of coldness and apparent insensitivity. He
fails to acknowledge his son because to do so would make apparent
to all his failure to observe the rules regarding intimate relations
between the sexes. He fulfills every duty that befalls him with
single minded intensity, though on Gus's death, he seems to lose that
intensity to the point of doubting the worthiness of all his efforts to
get the herd and crew to Montana and to establish the first cattle
ranch there.
Claire is rather dominated, psychologically, by her
masculinity. She requires to dominate her husband and is the
manager of her ranch. She also performs the functions of wife and
mother but with complaints and vaguely dreams of becoming a
writer. Writing is masculine because the point of it is to firmly
establish in consciousness important facts. Consciousness is itself
masculine due to its order and relatively sparse contents, compared
to unconsciousness, which is, of course, all the rest.
So, the central question of this drama is: Why does Claire
hate Call so? And, the answer is, because she realizes that her only
chance at happiness lies in Gus because he mirrors her personality,
and Gus is married to Call. So, she is jealous. She rationalizes that
her hatred results from Call's apparent callousness and disregard of
his familial relationships, but this is a rationalization. She also
disregards when convenient the obvious fact, even to her, that she
couldn't have a permanent relationship with Gus anyway, since he
doesn't allow himself to be dominated by anyone.
This final scene, makes clear the point of the drama, which
is the vanity of the ideal of manhood. This is a profound and
disturbing point to anyone old enough to remember the ideal in
action. The fact that it is vain, however, is inescapable and
demonstrated beyond any ability to debate by this drama. In fact
I would say this is a particularly fine dramatization of the
main point of the Book of Ecclesiastes from The Bible. I would go
on to say that everything has a price and the price of Call's vanity is
also dramatized, and it was a high price, indeed.
Having understood that, does Ecclesiastes warn us away from vanities,
including the vanity of Call? This is a much harder question. I think
not, since that would also be vain. I think Ecclesiastes gives us a
means of understanding our lives from an unusual perspective, and the
realization that our sufferings here on earth are inescapable.
This particular vanity, Call's, isn't gone. It isn't much
on view in everyday life, anymore, but a sort of one dimensional version of
it is apparent in much of American entertainment. Movies like "Die Hard", or "Rambo", where the superman is laying waste to all manner of failures and
even anti supermen are examples. Also pro wrestling, I would say, presents
a sort of comic book version of the manhood ideal.
Nietzsche introduced the notion of superman, in "Thus Spake Zarathustra", I
believe, and then twentieth century American entertainment turned it into
the famed "Man of Steel from Gotham". Zarathustra looks like extreme vanity,
but, with cloning making its appearance, maybe it too will come to pass.
For another view, look here.